<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creationists Found Out About Genetic Algorithms &#8212; And They Aren&#8217;t Happy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/</link>
	<description>.. the next generation of engineers and tech professionals ..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carles Tomás Martí</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Carles Tomás Martí</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Great article and the Creationism Algorithm is just hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article and the Creationism Algorithm is just hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by r1k0</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by r1k0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-149</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by r1k0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by r1k0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobaz</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>foobaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-145</guid>
		<description>One comment about the CreationismAlgorithm, it is possible for it to return without supernatural intervention. A cosmic particle could strike the CPU just so, causing the solution flag to flip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One comment about the CreationismAlgorithm, it is possible for it to return without supernatural intervention. A cosmic particle could strike the CPU just so, causing the solution flag to flip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Wow. Just ran your Creationism Algorithm and it returned 42.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Just ran your Creationism Algorithm and it returned 42.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanjayU</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>SanjayU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Great article, even better Creationism Algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, even better Creationism Algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audun Wilhelmsen</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Audun Wilhelmsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Excellent post! I stumbled over an article a while ago where someone used GA on FPGAs to generate a circuit that would output a single bit which was high if a word (like &quot;yes&quot;) was spoken. The generated design was much smaller than any human would have designed, and used interaction between transistors that we would not even have considered. I distinctly remember him describing how he removed a sub-circuit that should theoretically (ideally) have no effect on the output, and finding that it still ruined the circuit. I&#039;m sure you could find some &quot;irreducable complexity&quot; in there if you wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post! I stumbled over an article a while ago where someone used GA on FPGAs to generate a circuit that would output a single bit which was high if a word (like &#8220;yes&#8221;) was spoken. The generated design was much smaller than any human would have designed, and used interaction between transistors that we would not even have considered. I distinctly remember him describing how he removed a sub-circuit that should theoretically (ideally) have no effect on the output, and finding that it still ruined the circuit. I&#8217;m sure you could find some &#8220;irreducable complexity&#8221; in there if you wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebo</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>rebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-134</guid>
		<description>That is a well written response and clearly debunks his claims.

The problem is that Batten doesn&#039;t want a debate, all he is trying to do is to win over the ignorant.  He probably completely understands that his arguments are misleading, wrong, and ill conceived but he doesn&#039;t care as long as he can sow doubt in peoples mind he has accomplished something.

It is ok to lie if you lie for Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a well written response and clearly debunks his claims.</p>
<p>The problem is that Batten doesn&#8217;t want a debate, all he is trying to do is to win over the ignorant.  He probably completely understands that his arguments are misleading, wrong, and ill conceived but he doesn&#8217;t care as long as he can sow doubt in peoples mind he has accomplished something.</p>
<p>It is ok to lie if you lie for Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Brennan</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Firstly: yes, great article.

But secondly: @SC, I think it&#039;s *really* important to attack these stupid positions dispassionately and comprehensively.  If you don&#039;t, these lunatics end up taking up all available mind-space and will even claim that no-one has countered their spurious &quot;arguments&quot;.  Towit: Fox News.

NB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly: yes, great article.</p>
<p>But secondly: @SC, I think it&#8217;s *really* important to attack these stupid positions dispassionately and comprehensively.  If you don&#8217;t, these lunatics end up taking up all available mind-space and will even claim that no-one has countered their spurious &#8220;arguments&#8221;.  Towit: Fox News.</p>
<p>NB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Copley</title>
		<link>http://www.neosprockets.com/index.php/2009/09/gas-and-creationsists/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Copley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neosprockets.com/?p=2280#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Wow! Good rant - he really got to you!

Nice debunk of a hugely flawed article, but I think the best thing to do with ID / Creationist fools is to ignore them - completely. You&#039;re never going to change their minds by using any kind of logic - if they could follow logic, they&#039;d not believe the rubbish they do.

SC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Good rant &#8211; he really got to you!</p>
<p>Nice debunk of a hugely flawed article, but I think the best thing to do with ID / Creationist fools is to ignore them &#8211; completely. You&#8217;re never going to change their minds by using any kind of logic &#8211; if they could follow logic, they&#8217;d not believe the rubbish they do.</p>
<p>SC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
